What he promises
Financial freedom and content to "get out of debt"
The facts
12 cases as defendant for debt collection
Public records · Jalisco
Francisco Ignacio Pastrana Álvarez · Coach behind "Fórmula Activa+" with 12 judicial cases and millions in documented debts.
Documented facts
Who is
@nachito.conecta
Francisco Ignacio Pastrana Álvarez
Entrepreneurship and financial education coach in Mexico. Promotes the paid program "Fórmula Activa+" and social content under @nachito.conecta.
The judicial records tell a different story: years of debts with banks, investors and former employees. Someone who teaches financial freedom on social media while facing 12 lawsuits for debt collection.
Full profile →Francisco Ignacio Pastrana Álvarez
Bachelor's in Public Accounting · 2009
Master's in Taxation · 2019
PhD in Fiscal Sciences · 2020
All information comes from public judicial records in Jalisco. With a final judgment in some cases.
Fraud
On social media, @nachito.conecta promotes himself as someone who masters money. Public judicial records tell a different story: liquidity problems, payments that stopped arriving, banks in court and a multi-million contract with monthly installments halted since 2023.

What he promises
Financial freedom and content to "get out of debt"
The facts
12 cases as defendant for debt collection
What he promises
Investment coaching
The facts
Several million MXN claimed by a single investor
What he promises
Paid programs such as «Fórmula Activa+»
The facts
Conviction in the coinvestment lawsuit (Mar 2026), appeal pending
What he promises
Liquidity and financial stability
The facts
Multiple active lawsuits due to lack of liquidity
Anonymous report
Share your story and evidence anonymously
Your report will be documented securely. Each contribution helps document the case and protect others.
File your anonymous report →
@nachito.conecta
The gap between his social-media narrative and the public record
On social media he shows himself as a successful entrepreneur with credentials and businesses under control.
Public judicial records tell a different story. As of July 2026, he and his company face 12 cases as defendants for debt collection or claimed obligations.
Chapter 1
Several banks (Santander, Afirme, Ban-Tap) have sued him together with Hotel Quinta Fabiana. In some cases they reached payment agreements, but in others the situation is more serious since there is already a guilty verdict against him (case 00587/2024) by Joan Sebastián Cárdenas Villaseñor. This case remains active and Pastrana filed an amparo to try to stop it.
He also faces mortgage and commercial enforcement lawsuits, which means his properties and accounts may be at risk of seizure.
587/2024 · ordered to pay
Chapter 2
It is not just the banks. At least three former employees have sued him in labor court. One of them, Laura Estela Ferreira Jiménez, still has an open ordinary lawsuit with a trial hearing scheduled. Another former employee, Carlos Alberto Flores Torres, closed case 229/2024 through a settlement, but case 213/2024 remains in the enforcement stage. This points to serious problems meeting labor obligations.
3 labor lawsuits
Chapter 3
Under pressure, Pastrana has turned to several amparo lawsuits. Some were quickly rejected (such as 635/2025 against a commercial judge). The most sensitive is 430/2026, a criminal amparo related to the juvenile justice system, where he sought to block arrest orders. This was denied as well.
430/2026 · criminal amparo rejected
Chapter 4
Although there is not yet a final judgment in every case, the volume of banking, labor and commercial lawsuits in such a short time paints a clear picture: Hotel Quinta Fabiana and its owner are going through a major financial crisis. A supposed finance and tax expert with a doctorate does not usually accumulate this many simultaneous lawsuits.
That public profile clashes with what the courts show: growing debts, former employees suing and legal maneuvers to buy time.
Text based on public judicial records. Not legal advice. View cases →
Judicial records
12 lawsuits as defendant, grouped by claim type: debt collection, labor disputes and coinvestment contract litigation.
By nature of the claim
View sources →Banks and commercial or civil creditors
Telcel claims a commercial debt from 2006. Historical case with no recent activity.
Read more →
Santander is pursuing loan collection. Active case with seizures and filings in progress.
Read more →
Abigail Ayarzagoitia claims a debt against the hotel. A settlement was reached, but enforcement continues.
Read more →
Banca Afirme sued the hotel and Pastrana. The case ended with a payment agreement.
Read more →
Santander sued the hotel and Pastrana. The bank withdrew the suit and lifted precautionary measures.
Read more →
Ban-Tap claims a mortgage debt. The lawsuit was not admitted and the filings were returned.
Read more →
Workers vs. Hotel Quinta Fabiana
Former employee Carlos Flores Torres is enforcing a labor settlement against the hotel.
Read more →
Another case by Carlos Flores Torres for labor benefits. Closed through a settlement.
Read more →
Former hotel employee Laura Ferreira still has an open ordinary labor lawsuit.
Read more →
Lawsuits tied to investment contracts
Joan Cárdenas claims a coinvestment contract. Guilty verdict issued (Mar 2026).
Read more →
Second lawsuit by Cárdenas over the same contract. Pastrana has not yet been served.
Read more →
Third enforcement case by Cárdenas tied to the coinvestment contract. At an early stage.
Read more →
Contexto
Relato basado en expedientes públicos, PDFs documentales y registros agregados consultados al 01/07/2026. Describe hechos judiciales disponibles; no sustituye verificación oficial ni establece responsabilidad penal.
En Instagram y conferencias aparece @nachito.conecta: un coach de emprendimiento que habla de libertad financiera, negocios y programas de pago como Fórmula Activa+.
En los juzgados de Jalisco aparece otro nombre: Francisco Ignacio Pastrana Álvarez. A veces figura a título personal; otras, junto con Hotel Quinta Fabiana S.A. de C.V.
La marca pública promueve orden financiero; los expedientes muestran bancos, inversionistas y ex empleados reclamando pagos, convenios, ejecuciones, medidas precautorias y sentencias.
En este sitio se documentan doce expedientes en los que Pastrana Álvarez, Hotel Quinta Fabiana o ambos figuran como demandados por cobro de adeudos u obligaciones reclamadas.
Aparecen Santander, Afirme, Telcel, Corporativo Ban-Tap, una acreedora mercantil, tres asuntos laborales y tres juicios mercantiles vinculados a un contrato de varios millones de pesos mexicanos.
Solo en 2024 ya se concentran múltiples demandas laborales, un expediente hipotecario, un nuevo juicio de Santander y el caso mercantil que después registra sentencia definitiva en marzo de 2026.
| Expediente | Tipo | Estado | Quién demanda |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3413/2006 | Mercantil ejecutivo | Histórico | Telcel |
| 321/2023 | Oral mercantil | Activo (31 movimientos) | Banco Santander |
| 500/2023 | Oral mercantil | Activo (ejecución forzosa) | Abigail Ayarzagoitia TamezContra Hotel Quinta Fabiana |
| 361/2023 | Mercantil ejecutivo | Concluido por convenio | Banca Afirme |
| 351/2024 | Oral mercantil | Desistido por la actora | Banco Santander |
| 575/2024 | Civil hipotecario | No admitido | Corporativo Ban-Tap |
| 587/2024 | Oral mercantil | Activo; sentencia definitiva dictada 30/03/2026* | Joan Sebastián Cárdenas |
| 213/2024 | Laboral ejecución | En trámite | Flores Torres Carlos AlbertoContra Hotel Quinta Fabiana |
| 229/2024 | Laboral ejecución | Concluido (dic-2024) | Carlos Alberto Flores TorresContra Hotel Quinta Fabiana |
| 299/2024 | Ordinario laboral | Activo | Ferreira Jimenez Laura EstelaContra Hotel Quinta Fabiana |
| 831/2025 | Mercantil ejecutivo | Emplazamiento pendiente | Joan Sebastián Cárdenas |
| 1672/2025 | Mercantil ejecutivo | Etapa inicial | Joan Sebastián Cárdenas |
*En el 587/2024, el registro del 30/03/2026 informa sentencia definitiva que condena al pago de prestaciones reclamadas, con reducción de tasa moratoria. Después consta amparo directo promovido el 22/04/2026; la firmeza y ejecución deben verificarse en fuente judicial.
Ninguno de estos expedientes depende de los demás. Pero todos son similares: pagos, créditos u obligaciones que terceros dicen no haberse cumplido.
Bajo la razón social de Hotel Quinta Fabiana aparecen tres expedientes laborales: dos de ejecución (213/2024 en trámite; 229/2024 concluido por convenio) y un ordinario activo (299/2024).
Sumados a los juicios mercantiles y bancarios, vemos que Pastrana ha tenido problemas de liquidez serios, y estos se trasladaron al hotel donde también ha tenido problemas con sus empleados y acreedores.
El expediente más antiguo es el 3413/2006. El más reciente con sentencia relevante es el 587/2024.
Podemos ver claramente un patrón que ya está instalado desde hace años.
Los expedientes repiten una secuencia bastante clara:
Para alguien que llega por Instagram, una conferencia o Fórmula Activa+, la lectura práctica es simple: no evaluar solo el discurso. Revisar la trazabilidad legal antes de entregar dinero.
Quien está por invertir, contratar un programa o recomendar a @NACHITO.CONECTA no debería mirar solo el Instagram. Debería leer los expedientes, revisar nombres legales y preguntar por qué una persona que enseña libertad financiera acumula tantos conflictos públicos por pago.
Cronología
12 juicios ordenados por fecha de inicio: desplaza para explorar
Cronología
12 juicios ordenados por fecha de inicio: desliza o usa las flechas para navegar
Transparencia
Todo el contenido de este sitio proviene de fuentes verificables: expedientes judiciales consultables en registros públicos. No es información privada ni filtrada.
Información verificada
Información verificada
Aviso legal
Este sitio organiza información de registros públicos y documentación aportada en expedientes judiciales en trámite. No establece ni concluye que se haya cometido un delito. Ninguno de los expedientes listados es un procedimiento penal; todos son asuntos civiles, mercantiles o procesales. Varios casos están activos sin sentencia firme mientras otros ya tienen una sentencia firme condenatoria. Verifica siempre contra las fuentes originales antes de tomar decisiones.